Proposal criteria of paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis for predicting prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Article Thumbnail
[Released on 20/12/2021]

Authors: Tomomi Tanino , Kunio Yufu   , Takashi Shuto , Hiroki Sato , Masayuki Takano , Yumi Ishii , Shintaro Kira , Shotaro Saito , Hidekazu Kondo , Akira Fukui , Tomoko Fukuda , Hidefumi Akioka , Yasushi Teshima , Tomoyuki Wada , Shinji Miyamoto & Naohiko Takahashi  

Abstract

Background Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (PLF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to verify the conventional criteria of PLF-LG AS (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]>50%, mean aortic valve pressure gradient [AVPG]<40 mm Hg and stroke volume index [SVI]<35 ml/m2 by measuring Doppler method) compatible for predicting prognosis in patients undergoing TAVI.
Materials and methods A total of 128 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for AS with LVEF>50% were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the hospital readmission due to heart failure (HRHF) and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality after hospital discharge. The patients were classified by both the conventional criteria of PLF-LG AS and the proposal criteria of PLF-LG AS if mean aortic valve pressure gradient (AVPG)<40 mmHg and SVI by measuring Simpson’s method<cut off value based on the ROC curve for predicting HRHF.
Results According to the conventional criteria, only 6 patients were diagnosed with PLF-LG AS. However, according to the proposal criteria, 16 patients were diagnosed with PLF-LG AS. Fourteen patients developed HRHF during the follow-up period after TAVI. Based on the ROC curves, SVI by measuring Simpson’s method (cut off value=25 ml/m2) had higher sensitivity and specificity for predicting HRHF (AUC=0.74, p=0.0013) than SVI by measuring Doppler method (AUC=0.63, p=0.045). The multivariate analysis revealed that PLF-LG AS defined by the proposal criteria (HR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.60-17.16; p=0.0073) but not by the conventional criteria was independently associated with HRHF. PLF-LG AS defined by the conventional criteria and the proposal criteria were not associated with all-cause mortality in the univariate analysis.
Conclusions Our results demonstrated that new criteria of PLF-LG AS defined as SVI<25 ml/m2 measured by Simpson’s method could predict HRHF in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI.

Springer Nature

Springer Nature 2021 powered by GNM Healthcare Consulting Group, LLC

Proposal criteria of paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis for predicting prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Journal Image

Abstract

Background Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (PLF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to verify the conventional criteria of PLF-LG AS (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]>50%, mean aortic valve pressure gradient [AVPG]<40 mm Hg and stroke volume index [SVI]<35 ml/m2 by measuring Doppler method) compatible for predicting prognosis in patients undergoing TAVI.
Materials and methods A total of 128 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for AS with LVEF>50% were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the hospital readmission due to heart failure (HRHF) and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality after hospital discharge. The patients were classified by both the conventional criteria of PLF-LG AS and the proposal criteria of PLF-LG AS if mean aortic valve pressure gradient (AVPG)<40 mmHg and SVI by measuring Simpson’s method<cut off value based on the ROC curve for predicting HRHF.
Results According to the conventional criteria, only 6 patients were diagnosed with PLF-LG AS. However, according to the proposal criteria, 16 patients were diagnosed with PLF-LG AS. Fourteen patients developed HRHF during the follow-up period after TAVI. Based on the ROC curves, SVI by measuring Simpson’s method (cut off value=25 ml/m2) had higher sensitivity and specificity for predicting HRHF (AUC=0.74, p=0.0013) than SVI by measuring Doppler method (AUC=0.63, p=0.045). The multivariate analysis revealed that PLF-LG AS defined by the proposal criteria (HR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.60-17.16; p=0.0073) but not by the conventional criteria was independently associated with HRHF. PLF-LG AS defined by the conventional criteria and the proposal criteria were not associated with all-cause mortality in the univariate analysis.
Conclusions Our results demonstrated that new criteria of PLF-LG AS defined as SVI<25 ml/m2 measured by Simpson’s method could predict HRHF in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI.

Rate this post

Search

258 Articles Available

Research by Journal

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0-9